for early access to the latest igaming videos!
and get the latest igaming news first!
The Slovakia gaming tax reform has reopened one of the country’s most divisive debates.
The Slovakia Movement, known for its populist and pro-business stance, is calling for higher taxes on gaming venues, directly challenging the government’s recent decision to lower fees on slot machines and video terminals.
According to the party, the current reduction is nothing short of a “tax bonus” for large gambling operators. The proposal has ignited a political and social discussion about fairness, revenue, and responsibility in one of Eastern Europe’s most regulated markets.
Dispute over slot machine fees
At the centre of the Slovakia gaming tax reform debate is a significant tax cut.
The government reduced the levy from €9,300 to €4,400 per slot machine and €6,000 per video terminal. Lawmakers behind the Slovakia Movement argue this decision benefits major gaming operators at the expense of public finances.
MP Michal Šipoš has warned that the tax reduction could deprive the state of up to €52 million in annual revenue. He insists that restoring higher rates would create a fairer and more sustainable system, compelling gaming companies to adopt better practices and contribute more to the national budget.
The party’s message is this: large operators should carry more of the fiscal burden.
Concerns about player behaviour
Critics, however, caution that increasing taxes could have unintended consequences.
If costs rise, operators may pass them on to consumers, raising minimum deposits and encouraging riskier gambling behaviour. Some experts fear that stricter taxation could end up pushing vulnerable players further into harm rather than helping them.
This balance between regulation and protection lies at the heart of the Slovakia gaming tax reform. Policymakers face a difficult question, how to tax responsibly without driving the market underground.
Learning from Austria and Poland
Šipoš and his colleagues have urged the government to look abroad for inspiration.
Austria and Poland have both adopted stricter taxation systems that could serve as models for Slovakia. According to Šipoš, adopting a similar approach could generate €300 million in extra revenue each year.
Currently, Slovakia applies a flat tax per device alongside a 27 per cent levy on Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR). By contrast, Poland imposes a 12 per cent tax on sports betting stakes and a 50 per cent tax on slot and table games, as well as a 10 per cent withholding tax on winnings, soon rising to 15 per cent in 2026.
These comparisons fuel the argument that Slovakia’s lower rates leave significant money untapped.
Gambling growth and social concern
Adding urgency to the debate is the sharp rise in gambling expenditure across Slovakia, which has quadrupled in recent years.
MP Július Jakab has warned that failing to raise taxes sends the wrong message at a time when gambling risks are growing, especially among young and lower-income players.
He argues that higher levies would not only boost public revenue but also signal a stronger commitment to social responsibility. The movement believes that the current tax structure favours profitability over protection, and that a fiscal correction is overdue.
Balancing profit and protection
The Slovakia gaming tax reform debate reflects a broader European challenge: how to balance economic opportunity with ethical regulation.
On one side, the government wants to maintain a competitive and attractive market for investment. On the other, reformists demand a more redistributive model that ensures gambling contributes fairly to public welfare.
As lawmakers weigh fiscal incentives against social costs, one question defines the future of Slovakia’s gaming sector: can the country find a tax model that supports growth without compromising responsibility?
Source: SIGMA
