for early access to the latest igaming videos!
and get the latest igaming news first!
The California Department of Justice’s proposed regulations will push the state’s card rooms to the brink by seeking to deny card rooms the ability to operate modified versions of house-banked games—like blackjack and baccarat—that rely on the player-banker system administered through a third party. The proposed regulations would close a loophole that has allowed card rooms to operate games that mimic traditional house-banked casino games and create a scenario that previously favored card rooms, which has led to the economic imbalance against tribal casinos mandated by state law.
Preliminary Economic Impacts: Job and Revenue Losses
A Standardized Regulatory Impact Assessment (SRIA) that the state commissioned estimated economic impacts if the new rules were enacted, including potential revenue losses for card rooms statewide of $464 million and revenue gains of $232 million for tribal casinos. The SRIA also projected an annual loss of 364 full-time jobs for card rooms statewide over the next ten years. The impacts described raise questions for local municipalities and small businesses that rely on gaming taxes being generated by card rooms. Specifically, Club One Casino, a leading card room employer, estimated that it could not survive if it ceased to offer its table games, which has led to Club One Casino’s contribution to its local economy.
Industry and Community Responses to Proposed Regulations
There is a sharp divide between public opinion and industry response. Some card room operators and their supporters argue that player-dealer games have been legal and regulated for years, and changing the rules would disrupt decades of precedent and cause irreparable harm to the economy, local jobs, and municipal budgets. Tribal gaming representatives, on the other hand, support the proposal, arguing it will protect tribal casino rights and provide more structure around third-party player-provider operations.
Regulatory Context and Tribal Casino Influence
The rules are proposed after a court dismissed a tribal lawsuit that involved the issue of Senate Bill 549 and moved the battle from litigation to regulatory enforcement. If the rules take effect, the card room industry may drastically decline, potentially closing many venues or forcing them to shift away from gaming. This would mean more gambling revenue is directed into tribal casinos and could create a situation for municipalities that rely on tax revenue from card rooms, where they will need to contemplate budgets or services to fund.
Possible Outcomes for Local Economies and City Budgets
Local governments that are funded by card room tax revenue have an uncertain future. Any closures or reduction of card rooms will directly reduce their income streams, which can affect the public services often funded by those revenues. There will also be a ripple effect to vendors, employees, and community stakeholders tied to this industry.
Protest Movements and Stakeholder Lobbying
Over 150 workers, union members, and city leaders protested the proposed changes outside the Attorney General’s office in Los Angeles in October 2025, raising concern about job loss and the financial viability of their communities. The debate is a high-stakes debate about the future of gaming in California with significant implications to the economy, employment, local governments, and tribal-state relations.
The Future of California’s Gaming Environment
The proposed regulations could significantly reduce California’s card room market. The result could be a drastic reconfiguration of the state’s gaming ecosystem, reducing individuals’ choices and consolidating increased power and revenues to tribal casinos. This also sets the stage for continuing legal and political battles as stakeholders attempt to govern or balance regulation and a fair, clean, and economically viable gaming ecosystem in California.
Source: The Gaming Boardroom
