for early access to the latest igaming videos!
and get the latest igaming news first!
Nevada has just thrown a short-term roadblock in front of Polymarket, and at a bad timing, at least for Polymarket. The Super Bowl week on the calendar, but a state judge has ordered the prediction-market platform to stop offering event contracts in Nevada for an initial 14-day period.
The temporary restraining order was announced after the Nevada Gaming Control Board filed a civil enforcement action against Blockratize Inc., the company behind Polymarket’s operations, arguing that Polymarket’s contracts are wagers under Nevada law and require state gaming licensure.
Nevada likely to win legal battle against Polymarket
According to coverage of the ruling, Jason D. Woodbury granted the restraining order and said the regulator is reasonably likely to succeed on the core legal question in the case. The order bars Polymarket from offering the contracts in Nevada for 14 days while the early phase of the lawsuit plays out.
The state argues that Nevada already has a tightly controlled sports betting market. A company offering sports-style outcome contracts without a Nevada license is operating outside the rules Nevada uses to protect consumers and monitor integrity.
A U.S. product with tight limits, plus a bigger offshore shadow
Polymarket’s U.S. footprint has been narrow compared to what many people associate with the brand. Recent survey has described Polymarket’s U.S. offering as very limited, as compared with its broader international product which remains accessible to non-U.S. users, and, in practice, to some U.S. users who route around geofencing.
However, Nevada is still treating this as a live risk. Regulators aren’t only thinking about what’s listed today, but what could be listed tomorrow, especially when the state is staring at its biggest betting weekend of the year.
Polymarket says a fuller response is coming
Court coverage indicates Polymarket planned to file a detailed opposition shortly after the order was issued. For now, the state has the advantage, unless it can convince the court to lift or narrow the restraining order at the next stage.
Nevada has already been down this road with Kalshi
This isn’t Nevada’s first major clash with an event-contract platform. In federal court, Nevada fought Kalshi over sports-related contracts and won a significant ruling in late 2025 when Andrew Gordon found Kalshi was subject to Nevada gaming law in that dispute. Kalshi has appealed to the Ninth Circuit, and parts of the case have been paused while the appeal proceeds.
The bigger collision: state gaming law vs federal event-contract oversight
Polymarket and Kalshi both argue that event contracts belong under the federal umbrella of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, not state-by-state gaming regulation. That debate has intensified as the CFTC signals it intends to publish clearer event-contract rules to reshape how these products are treated nationwide, but won’t automatically end state challenges in the short term.
Source: Covers
