for early access to the latest igaming videos!
and get the latest igaming news first!
Massachusetts sportsbooks handled $914.7m in settled wagers in November, setting a third consecutive monthly record and extending the state’s strongest run since legal betting went live.
According to figures from the Massachusetts Gaming Commission (MGC), November handle rose from $872.9m in September to $892.2m in October before reaching $914.7m. Compared with November 2024, when handle stood at $777.8m, the market is up almost 18%, indicating continued growth beyond the initial post-launch period.
Massachusetts sports betting posts third straight record month as regulators eye bet-limit rules
Taxable sports betting revenue for November totalled $94.9m, generating about $18.9m in state tax receipts under the current 20% rate for online wagering and 15% for retail. Most revenue came from mobile operators, reflecting the dominance of online betting in the state.
Using the monthly totals, November’s implied hold rate sits in the low double digits, broadly in line with operator performance during the peak football calendar, when regular NFL and college schedules tend to drive higher engagement and parlay volumes.
DraftKings and FanDuel remain out in front
Market share remained highly concentrated at the top of the operator table.
DraftKings, which is headquartered in Boston, reported $475.8m in November handle and $48.1m in taxable revenue. FanDuel followed with $235.4m in wagers and $31.7m in taxable revenue. Together, the two national leaders accounted for the majority of online betting activity.
A second tier of operators posted smaller but still significant volumes. BetMGM recorded $62.1m in handle and $6.8m in taxable revenue, while Fanatics reported $65.8m in handle and $5.1m in taxable revenue. Caesars generated $28.9m in wagers and $1.9m in taxable revenue. ESPN BET, still in its early stages in Massachusetts, reported $27.8m in handle and $2.1m in taxable revenue.
Regulators focus on bet-limiting transparency
Alongside the revenue growth, the MGC is using public meetings to examine how operators manage stake limits on individual customers.
Commissioners have been reviewing proposals that would require sportsbooks to notify players when they are limited and to provide a basic explanation for the decision. The draft approach is framed as a transparency requirement rather than a cap on risk management, but operators would need to adjust internal processes if the rules are adopted.
For sportsbooks, formal disclosure obligations would touch trading systems, customer-communication tools, and complaint handling, as well as responsible gambling workflows. Any new rules would also require audit trails that show when and why limits were applied to a given account.
Suppliers providing risk, CRM, and back-office tools are watching the discussion as an early signal of where technical requirements may move next in major US jurisdictions. If Massachusetts finalises detailed disclosure standards, similar expectations could surface in other states where consumer protection is already a policy priority.
More growth possible for the market in 2026
The immediate question for 2026 is whether the proposed bet-limit transparency rules move from consultation to final regulation, and how prescriptive the final language will be. The level of detail required in customer notices and the frequency with which operators must update them will determine the operational impact.
On the commercial side, three consecutive monthly handle records suggest that Massachusetts remains in a growth phase during core sports season, with football and basketball providing a strong schedule. Performance in the state is likely to remain a reference point for national strategy, particularly for brands with a heavy footprint in the Northeast and for investors tracking how tax yields and regulatory expectations evolve in a mature yet still-expanding market.
Source: Covers
