for early access to the latest igaming videos!
and get the latest igaming news first!
Kalshi has pulled its request for a new injunction in Maryland after coming to an agreement with state officials. This arrangement puts a temporary hold on the enforcement of state gambling laws against the company.
With this deal in place, Maryland will refrain from taking any actions until the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit makes a ruling on Kalshi’s ongoing appeal.
In the filing submitted on August 12, Kalshi noted that Maryland’s promise of non-enforcement removes the urgent need for court intervention. This agreement will stay active until the appellate court issues its decision, which is likely to take at least two months after the briefing period concludes.
According to the current timeline, Kalshi is set to submit its opening brief by September 15, while Maryland’s response is due by October 15. The central issue in this dispute revolves around whether Kalshi’s sports event contracts should be governed by federal commodities regulations or by state sports betting laws.
Court Denied Kalshi’s Initial Injunction Request
The legal fight heated up when Kalshi faced a setback in the US District Court for the District of Maryland.
Judge Adam B. Abelson denied the company’s request for an injunction, stating that while the federal Commodity Exchange Act takes precedence over state laws regarding commodity regulations, it does not negate state authority over gambling matters.
The judge pointed out that if Kalshi wanted to continue offering sports event contracts in Maryland, the company could apply for a state sports betting license.
Fourth Circuit Appeal
After facing defeat in Maryland, Kalshi decided to take its case to the Fourth Circuit, contending that the state’s laws should not govern federally regulated contracts.
The company sought a new injunction to allow it to continue its operations during the appeal, highlighting the potential financial damage it could suffer if it had to adhere to state betting regulations before the matter was settled.
Had the recent agreement not been reached, Maryland could have enforced a cease-and-desist order against Kalshi, which would have disrupted its business and possibly led to greater losses if the appellate court later ruled in favor of the company.
By securing the temporary non-enforcement commitment from the state, Kalshi has effectively sidestepped an immediate legal crisis while maintaining its stance in the ongoing debate over the regulation of prediction markets and the authority over sports wagering.
Source: NEXT.io
