Monday, September 14, 2026

NOW: LATEST STORIES

spot_img
18+ | Affiliate links | T&C applyWe may earn a comission... Affiliate disclosure
TRENDING
Virginia
Crown Coins Social Casino
1,500,000 Crown Coins
+ 75 FREE SC on first purchase
Visa Discover AmEx + more
Play now!
19+ | T&Cs apply | Free to play | No purchase necessary | Void where prohibited by law

Related Posts

Judge Rejects NCAA Bid to Block DraftKings’ March Madness Branding

A federal judge has refused the NCAA’s request to immediately stop DraftKings from using some of college basketball’s most recognizable tournament names.

The ruling, handed down Thursday in the Southern District of Indiana, denied a temporary restraining order that would have barred the sportsbook from promoting its business with terms such as “March Madness,” “Final Four,” “Elite Eight,” and “Sweet Sixteen.”

Judge Tanya Walton Pratt said the NCAA had not shown that DraftKings’ use of the phrases would cause irreparable harm. In her order, she noted that the association could still pursue a preliminary or permanent injunction once more evidence is presented.

“With further discovery the NCAA may be able to show they are entitled to a preliminary or permanent injunction, and those claims remain pending,” Pratt wrote in an AP report.

NCAA confidence in case despite ruling

Even though the judge refused to grant a temporary restraining order, the NCAA has made it clear that it is not backing down.

DraftKings has argued that its use of tournament phrases falls under fair use and is protected by the First Amendment, but the NCAA insists the issue is about consumer confusion. The association believes that linking its trademarks to betting could mislead fans into thinking there is an official connection between the NCAA and the sportsbook.

After the ruling, the NCAA pointed to the court’s own acknowledgment that confusion is possible and that DraftKings’ use of the marks appears designed to benefit from the tournaments’ reputation.

With that in mind, the association is preparing to press forward through discovery, and, if necessary, a jury trial. While DraftKings can continue using the terms during the 2026 tournaments, the case remains active in the Southern District of Indiana, and the possibility of a permanent injunction still hangs over the dispute.

Join us on for early access to the latest igaming videos!

Get notified about our video interviews, slot reviews and other exciting video content. All our videos are published on YouTube first.

Connect with us on and get the latest igaming news first!

Stay up to date with the latest news from the iGaming industry. Check out our interviews, reviews, news and videos. Be the first to know when a story breaks.

Chidubem Ovute
Chidubem Ovute
Chidubem is a seasoned casino journalist for iGamingToday.com, bringing over six years of expertise in the online and land-based gambling industry. Known for his in-depth analysis and engaging articles, Chidubem covers a broad spectrum of topics, including , regulatory developments, reviews, slot game launches, and emerging trends in iGaming. His deep knowledge of gambling regulations, online slots, bonus structures, and player engagement strategies has made him a trusted voice among both casual players and industry professionals. Dedicated to accurate reporting and responsible gambling advocacy, Dubem’s work at iGamingToday.com continues to provide readers with valuable insights into the fast-paced world of casinos and gaming innovation

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles