for early access to the latest igaming videos!
and get the latest igaming news first!
A legal battle over alleged patent infringement in the gaming industry has ended in favor of Light & Wonder, as a federal judge ruled against Evolution in a dispute over its Lightning Roulette game.
Court Ruling Declares Patents Invalid
On February 11, US District Judge Cristina D. Silva dismissed Evolution’s lawsuit, concluding that the company’s patents were not valid under legal standards. According to her ruling, the patents in question—covering aspects of Evolution’s Lightning Roulette—were based on abstract concepts rather than tangible innovations eligible for patent protection.
Judge Silva explained:
“Based on my analysis of representative Claim 1 of the ‘014 patent, I conclude that the ‘014, ‘024, and ‘371 patents are invalid under Alice. Therefore, L&W’s motion to dismiss must be granted”
Evolution’s Claims Against Light & Wonder
The dispute arose when Light & Wonder introduced RouletteX, a game that Evolution alleged was a direct copy of its Lightning Roulette. Evolution claimed that RouletteX replicated key elements of its game, such as randomly assigned multipliers between 50x and 500x and the selection of up to five numbers per spin. The company also pointed to RouletteX’s animated lightning strikes, arguing that they closely mirrored those in Lightning Roulette.
Adding to the controversy, Evolution revealed that it had previously shared confidential details about Lightning Roulette with Light & Wonder during negotiations for a potential collaboration to bring the game to land-based casinos. The company argued that this information may have been used to develop RouletteX without permission.
Judge’s Reasoning and Future Steps
Despite Evolution’s claims, the court found that the patents primarily described a method of assigning financial payouts based on probabilities, which falls under the category of abstract ideas that cannot be patented. Furthermore, Judge Silva noted that Evolution’s patents failed to demonstrate how their technological components provided a meaningful improvement over traditional roulette.
While dismissing the case, the judge granted Evolution the opportunity to revise and resubmit its complaint. However, she expressed skepticism about the company’s chances of overcoming the legal hurdles, stating she had “some doubt that Evolution can amend around this problem.”
Potential Settlement and Next Steps
The case has now been referred to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference. Should Evolution decide to continue its legal pursuit, the company has 14 days following the settlement discussions to file an amended complaint.
Source: Next.io
