for early access to the latest igaming videos!
and get the latest igaming news first!
Three online gaming companies have asked India’s Supreme Court to reconsider its May 27 ruling on the 28% Goods and Services Tax applied to the full face value of bets. The petition follows a decision that upheld the tax treatment for real-money online games and validated retrospective tax demands.
Review Petition Filed
Play Games24x7, Junglee Games, and Sachiko Gaming have filed review petitions seeking a fresh look at the court’s earlier decision. This judgement held that real money games played online, including those of fantasy sports, are taxable for their face values and not just for platform costs or gaming income.
The earlier ruling also made it clear that the 2023 amendment to GST does not introduce a new tax system but clarifies existing laws. That interpretation allowed authorities to continue pursuing retrospective tax claims issued by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence.
The companies are now asking the court to revisit that position. Their move keeps the dispute over online gaming taxation active after the earlier ruling had appeared to settle the issue in favour of the tax authorities.
Tax Dispute Continues
However, the gaming industry has contended that such a tax should be levied only from October 1, 2023, when the GST regulations were amended. The operators have cautioned that any retroactive charges could compromise the sustainability of their enterprises.
The stakes are significant. The industry faces demands amounting to INR1.12tn, or US$13.4bn, against 71 gaming companies. Those liabilities have made the issue one of the most closely watched tax disputes involving India’s online gaming sector.
The Supreme Court will now consider whether the review petitions raise sufficient grounds to reopen the case. Until then, the earlier ruling remains in place.
Full Face Value At Issue
At the center of the dispute is whether GST should be charged on the entire amount staked by players or only on a narrower base, such as platform fees or gross gaming revenue. The court’s May 27 ruling backed the broader interpretation, which has been challenged by operators since the decision was handed down.
For the companies involved, the answer carries direct financial implications. A tax on the full face value of bets creates a much larger liability than one based only on platform fees or gross gaming revenue. That is why the review petition has become the next step in the legal process.
The case also reflects the wider uncertainty that has surrounded online gaming taxation since the GST amendments were introduced. With the review request now before the court, the sector is waiting to see whether the judges will agree to take a second look.
Next Step For The Court
Whether or not the Supreme Court agrees to hear the petitions in this case will determine if the case gets reviewed. If the court hears the petitions, then the bigger issue regarding taxes will come back into the courts again. However, if not, the May 27 ruling will be the last one made.
For India’s online gaming companies, the outcome is likely to shape the financial and legal landscape they face under the 28% GST regime. The petition keeps the dispute alive while operators continue to challenge the scale and timing of the tax demands.
Source: Focus Gaming News
