for early access to the latest igaming videos!
and get the latest igaming news first!
Alabama state Rep. Phillip Ensler (D-Montgomery) is signaling that, if elected lieutenant governor, he would lean on the office’s public platform to revive long-stalled gambling legislation, framing a state lottery and related gaming measures as a pragmatic revenue and policy tool rather than a partisan flashpoint.
In a recent radio interview tied to his newly launched campaign, Ensler argued that Alabama’s lack of a lottery is increasingly difficult to defend as residents routinely buy tickets across state lines, leaving potential public dollars on the table.
He said Alabama leaders should “focus on the things that are gonna improve people’s quality of life,” and he cast gambling policy, particularly a lottery, as part of that agenda alongside healthcare, education, and mental health access.
“I hear from people all over the state—Democrat, Republican, white, black, poor, more affluent—that say it’s crazy that we don’t have a state lottery,” Ensler said. “People cross over state lines to buy lotto tickets, and we’re missing out on hundreds of millions of dollars that could be used for education or could be used for healthcare.”
A familiar issue, resurfacing in a new campaign lane
In the same vein as Ensler’s comments denote, gambling expansion has been debated for years, often advancing in one chamber but failing to clear the finish line before legislative deadlines. Alabama remains one of the few states without a lottery, and past proposals have typically centered on some combination of a lottery, expanded gaming, and, more recently, sports betting.
Legalization may not suddenly be imminent, but with a statewide candidate explicitly staking out gambling as a priority issue and promising to invest political capital in building a coalition, things will look forward for the industry.
Gambling is not his first topic, but it is one he presents as an example of a solvable issue with tangible fiscal upside.
And the push goes further, Ensler described his approach as hands-on convening rather than simply issuing statements.
Using the office’s influence in this case would mean “not just [publicly calling] for it,” he said, but “to really spend that time to convene meetings, to try to bring people together, to reach a consensus.”
He added that he would not try to force lawmakers into supporting legalization, saying he would not “bully them into it in a bad way,” but would push for collaboration: “Hey, let’s put our heads together and figure this out.”
The pitch: lottery and gambling as funding capacity
Ensler has built his campaign message around what he calls “real problems, not culture wars and personal agendas,” tying gambling to broader service-delivery arguments. In his framing, the state’s refusal to expand Medicaid, hospital closures, school funding pressures, and mental health access gaps are practical problems that require new capacity—whether through the budget process or new revenue sources.
“Healthcare is a huge one,” Ensler said. “The fact that we have not expanded Medicaid and are dealing with hospital closures is literally a matter of life or death.”
He also emphasized teacher support and public school resources, arguing that the state needs to “back that with better pay and good health insurance and retirement,” and linking that investment to outcomes: “When they’re doing better, they do a better job for our children.”
Industry analysis ahead of the election and against a backdrop of failed attempts
Alabama is more about long-run optionality in a region where surrounding jurisdictions already have established lottery ecosystems and, in several cases, legal sports betting.
If a serious legalization package returns, it would likely trigger a familiar chain of commercial considerations.
Ensler’s argument also comes against a backdrop of repeated legislative attempts that have struggled to reconcile competing interests, regional priorities, moral opposition, and disagreements over what a legalization package should include.
Recent years have shown that even when legislation gains traction, it can be derailed late by procedural deadlines or by lack of consensus on details. A comprehensive gambling package advanced in 2024 but ultimately fell short as negotiations collapsed near the end of the session.
For now, it’s a campaign promise. But in a state where gambling bills routinely come close and then fall apart, even the promise to stay in the fight, and to organize it like a negotiation, may be the most material shift for the market to track.
Source: Alabama Political Reporter
