for early access to the latest igaming videos!
and get the latest igaming news first!
Hundreds of thousands of Dutch gamblers who lost money through unlicensed online casinos may face a far steeper challenge in getting it back after the Supreme Court ruled that gambling contracts with illegal operators are not automatically invalid.
The decision settles a legal dispute that has been building for years as players increasingly turned to the courts in an attempt to reclaim money lost before the Dutch online gambling market was opened and regulated in October 2021.
At the heart of the cases was a simple question with potentially enormous financial consequences: if an online casino operated in the Netherlands without a license, did that automatically make every gambling agreement void?
The country’s highest court answered no.
That conclusion weakens the legal strategy used in a series of collective claims against international gambling brands including Unibet, Bwin and PokerStars. Lawyers representing players had argued that because online gambling was prohibited in the Netherlands before legalization, agreements entered into during that period should be treated as invalid, allowing customers to recover their losses.
Limited Openings Remain for Compensation Claims
The ruling does not entirely shut the door on compensation claims. The Supreme Court indicated that gamblers could still seek to undo agreements under particular circumstances, including cases involving mistake, or pursue damages if unlawful conduct can be established. Any recovery effort, however, is now likely to depend on the facts of individual cases rather than on a blanket finding that all agreements were legally ineffective.
Benzi Loonstein, whose firm has been involved in mass claims against gambling operators, said the outcome affects a large group of players and potentially concerns hundreds of millions of euros in gambling losses accumulated over many years.
Dutch courts had sought guidance from the Supreme Court in two separate gambling disputes, asking whether agreements with operators lacking a Dutch license should automatically be considered invalid. The court’s decision follows earlier advice from the Advocate General, who had already signaled that gamblers could not assume they were entitled to refunds simply because an operator was unlicensed.
For players pursuing claims, the ruling represents a setback after years of litigation built around the argument that illegal gambling contracts should never have been enforceable in the first place.
Loonstein described the judgment as disappointing for many gamblers but acknowledged that it ends a prolonged period of uncertainty surrounding the issue. He also pointed to a divergence with legal developments elsewhere in Europe. Courts in Germany and Austria have taken a different view, treating agreements with illegal operators as invalid, while the Dutch Supreme Court has adopted the opposite position.
The immediate effect will be felt in courtrooms across the Netherlands, where proceedings in comparable cases had been waiting for guidance from the Supreme Court. Those lawsuits are now expected to move forward under the framework established by Friday’s ruling.
For firms representing gamblers, attention is shifting to what legal arguments remain available. Loonstein said his office is examining possible routes that could still allow players to seek compensation from operators that offered gambling services without Dutch authorization.
