In a major blow to the government’s fiscal policy, the move by the administration to increase the IOF (Tax on Financial Operations) was rejected by both the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate. In a move taken on Wednesday, June 25, the legislative branch endorsed a decree freezing the enforcement of three decrees issued by the government that sought to increase IOF fees on financial activities such as loans, financing, credit card transactions, and money transfers abroad.
At the Chamber, the roll-back of the IOF increase was voted into law with a theatrical majority of 383 votes in favor and 98 against. The Senate then also conducted a symbolic vote, completing the process to declare the government’s IOF amendments as null and void.
Effect on Budget Planning for 2025
The rollback of the IOF makes the government’s already challenging task of balancing the federal budget even more challenging. Having had an ambitious 2025 fiscal target of no deficit (with a 0.25% of GDP tolerance, or roughly BRL 31 billion), the government had planned to rely on the IOF increase to receive around BRL 20.5 billion of income. The cancellation of this plan requires that this money be sourced from elsewhere.
So far, the government has already frozen or blocked BRL 31.3 billion worth of discretionary expenditure this year—the largest contingency in five years. However, by itself, this is not enough to achieve the 2025 target.
Betting Tax in the Center of the Government’s Fiscal Drive
After IOF rejection, a broader revenue package was offered by the government in the form of Provisional Measure (MP), and it includes greater taxation on sports betting, or “bets“. The MP would raise the tax rate applied to betting companies from 12% to 18%, thereby making the sector one of the key sources of short-term revenue.
The MP involves other tax reforms such as higher levies on Interest on Net Equity (JCP), taxing crypto assets, and unification of income tax on investment products. Despite these extensive programs, the betting tax has received most interest on the basis of the sense of urgency and predicted impact on the growing iGaming sector in Brazil.
Political Resistance and Market Concerns
There is more resistance to the MP in Congress. Parliamentary leaders have apparently informed the Executive Branch that the Provisional Measure will not move forward in the current state. According to Valor Econômico, the feedback was given directly to the Executive Secretary of the Ministry of Finance, Dario Durigan.
Analysts and market players also weighed in. Marcos Praça, director of Zero Markets Brasil, expressed the view that the political calendar—particularly the 2026 elections—will lead legislators to resist government revenue proposals. “Parliamentarians will likely keep tying the government’s hands“, Praça asserted.
Harrison Gonçalves of the CFA Society Brazil emphasized the need for fiscal prudence. “It’s crucial to put public finances in order and cut spending before even considering any new tax increases“, he said.
Next Steps and Legislative Uncertainty
The official publication of the suspension of IOF hikes is to follow next. Meanwhile, the government must reevaluate its budget strategy and potentially remake the existing Provisional Measure in a bid to advance in Congress.
This episode highlights the difficulties of steering fiscal consolidation within Brazil’s intricate political landscape, especially where novel taxes overlap with controversial areas such as betting and digital money. The government has a diminishing window within which to come up with a credible and politically acceptable plan for satisfying its 2025 fiscal targets.
Source: YogoNet



for early access to the latest igaming videos!

and get the latest igaming news first!




